The Philippine population reached 100 million in 2014, and
is projected to reach 101.6 million this year. The projection is based on an
annual growth rate of 2.1%, which, while lower than the 2.42% rate from 1990 to
1995, is still the highest in the Southeast Asian region. Population growth
rate was 1.9% in Cambodia, 1.6% in Malaysia, 1% in Vietnam and Indonesia, and
0.4% in Thailand, according to Rosalinda Marcelino, Population Commission
director for Metro Manila. During the public hearings on the Reproductive
Health Bill, Marcelino also told the House Committee on Population that the
population would continue to grow for the next 50 years even if couples were to
limit the number of their children to two each, because the population is
predominantly young. Some 35% of Filipinos are below 15 years old, while 15%
are 15 to 24 years old. “…More than 50% of [Filipinos] are young and, in due
time, would become parents. And even if each couple would only have two
children, our population will still continue to grow in the next 50 years,”
Marcelino said.
For many politicians such figures are “the best argument for
birth control”. They argued that high population growth rates exacerbate
poverty, and that there is more poverty among big families. In addition,
families with fewer children can better provide for the education, health,
nutrition and other needs of each child, since whatever income they earn can be
divided among fewer individuals. There was nothing new in these arguments. Almost
all have been raised in other countries with high incidences of poverty.
Against the argument that a lower population growth rate
would reduce poverty is that the causes of poverty are: flawed philosophies of
development, misguided economic policies, greed, corruption, social inequities,
lack of access to education, poor economic and social services, poor
infrastructures, etc. The conclusion is unavoidable: to escape from poverty, we
have to address the real causes of poverty and not population. South Africa,
for example, has lowered its previously high population growth rate, but is
still hounded by poverty.
The Philippines can arguably support a population of 200
million — but only if the structural causes of poverty were addressed. Among
these is the grossly unequal distribution of wealth, in which the 25 wealthiest
individuals appropriate the equivalent of the incomes of 70 million Filipinos. IBON
Databank also points out that while the wealth of the richest Filipinos tripled
during the last five years, there are more poor Filipinos (25.8% of the
population) during the same period. The solutions to Philippine poverty are
fairly well known, but unlikely to be adopted by a political class that is
hardly committed to the authentic transformation of Philippine society from one
in which economic growth benefits only a handful of families to one in which
economic development would benefit the majority. In the Philippine context, a key
solution include the outright abolition of the land tenancy system. The
archaic, grossly inefficient and unjust tenancy system has persisted, primarily
because the attempts at so-called land reform have been deliberately riddled
with loopholes by the landlord-dominated Congress.
Poverty is the cause of overpopulation, rather than its
result.
http://bulatlat.com/main/2015/08/15/poverty-is-the-cause-not-the-result-of-overpopulation/
No comments:
Post a Comment