97 per cent of the world's soya crop is fed to livestock. It
would take 40 million tons of food to eliminate the most extreme cases of world
hunger, yet nearly 20 times that amount of grain is fed to farmed animals every
year in order to produce meat. In a world where an estimated 850 people do not
have enough to eat, it is criminally wasteful to feed perfectly edible food to
animals on farms in order to produce a burger rather than feeding it directly
to people, especially when you consider that it takes roughly six pounds of
grain to produce one pound of pork. As long as a single child goes hungry, this
kind of waste is unconscionable.
Countries around the globe are bulldozing huge swathes of
land in order to make room for more factory farms to house all the additional
chickens, cows and other animals as well as for the huge quantities of crops
needed to feed them. But when you eat plant foods directly, instead of
indirectly eating bushels and bushels of grain and soya that have been
funnelled through animals first, you need a lot less land.
Vegfam, a charity which funds sustainable plant-food
projects, estimates that a 10-acre farm can support 60 people by growing
soybeans, 24 people by growing wheat or 10 people by growing maize, but only
two by raising cattle. What's more, Dutch scientists predict that 2.7 billion
hectares of land currently used for cattle grazing would be freed up by global
vegetarianism, along with 100 million hectares of land currently used to grow
crops for livestock.
Factory-farmed animals are disease-ridden as a result of
being crammed by the thousands into filthy sheds, which are a breeding ground
for new strains of dangerous bacteria and viruses. Pigs, chickens and other
animals on factory farms are fed a steady diet of drugs to keep them alive in
these unsanitary, stressful conditions, increasing the chance that drug-resistant
superbugs will develop. A senior officer with the UN's Food and Agriculture
Organisation called the intensive industrial farming of livestock an
“opportunity for emerging disease”, while the US Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention declared that “much of antibiotic use in animals is unnecessary
and inappropriate and makes everyone less safe”. Sure, the overprescribing of
antibiotics for humans plays a part in antibiotic resistance. But eliminating
the factory farms from which many antibiotic-resistant bacteria emerge would make
it more likely that we could continue to count on antibiotics to cure serious
illnesses.
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/five-things-would-happen-if-everyone-stopped-eating-meat-a6844811.html
No comments:
Post a Comment