15 ways Bill Clinton’s presidency did not serve the people
or the world, and in many ways deepened and perpetuated the problems we face
today.
1. Prison-loving
president. In May, on the heels of the unrest in Baltimore sparked by Freddie
Gray’s death in police custody, Clinton apologized for locking too many people
up. Thanks, Bill.
The 2.4 million people in prison and the 160,000 Americans
serving life in prison largely because of his policies might be excused for not
accepting Clinton's apology. Tag-teaming with ex-President Ronald Reagan,
Clinton is the president most responsible for the mass incarceration of
Americans on an epic scale. The gung-ho crime fighter-in-chief passed the
single most damaging law with his omnibus federal crime bill in 1994, which
included the infamous “three strikes” law (three felony convictions means a
life sentence) and ensured that mandatory minimum sentences imprisoned even
low-level, non-violent offenders for a long, long time.
Clinton discussed his regrets about the crime bill with
CNN's Christiane Amanpour. "The problem is the way it was written and
implemented is we cast too wide a net and we had too many people in
prison," he said. "And we wound up... putting so many people in
prison that there wasn't enough money left to educate them, train them for new
jobs and increase the chances when they came out so they could live productive
lives."
All true, except it was not just lack of funds that
eliminated education and rehabilitation programs in prison, it was a deliberate
choice. Sensing the political popularity of being tough on crime, Clinton fully
embraced the lock-'em-up-and-throw-away-the-key mentality, and gloated about
three strikes. It strains credulity to think that this exceptionally
intelligent man did not understand the dire consequences of what he was doing,
as his wife now says.
Clinton’s Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of
1994 helped set the national mood. Dozens of states followed with their own
mandatory minimum laws. While there is some talk today of criminal justice
reform on a minor level (like for low-level drug offenses), no one is talking
about the all-but-forgotten population doing hard time thanks in large part to
Clinton.
2. Punitive welfare reform. The consequences of Bill
Clinton’s welfare reform bill have been devastating for millions of American
families. The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act
of 1996 took a page directly from Republican Speaker of the House Newt
Gingrich’s Contract with America. In an atmosphere steeped in decades of
conservative scaremongering around the specter of sexually reckless “welfare
queens,” Clinton’s 1992 campaign promise to “end welfare as we know it” played
directly to white voters' fears of black crime and poverty. Twenty years after
scrapping the longstanding Aid to Families with Dependent Children in favor of
the right wing’s underfunded and more punitive vision, the number of poor
American children has exploded and black welfare recipients are subject to the
system’s most stringent rules.
In 2012, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities found
that while “in 1996, for every 100 families with children living in poverty,
TANF [Temporary Assistance for Needy Families] provided cash aid to 68
families,” that number plunged to 27 out of every 100 families living in
poverty by 2010. Conservatives trumpet these numbers, often citing the fact
that nationally, TANF enrollment fell 58 percent between 1995-2010. But they
neglect to mention that the number of poor families with children rose 17
percent in the same period.
Sociologist Joe Soss, who has examined the long-term racial
consequences of welfare reform, which allowed states to decide how funds were
allotted and eligibility determined, also noted that, “all of the states with
more African Americans on the welfare rolls chose tougher rules…[E]ven though
the Civil Rights Act prevents the government from creating different programs
for black and white recipients, when states choose according to this pattern,
it ends up that large numbers of African Americans get concentrated in the
states with the toughest rules, and large numbers of white recipients get
concentrated in the states with the more lenient rules.”
3. Wall Street’s
Deregulator-in-Chief. As president,
Clinton outdid the GOP when it came to unleashing Wall Street’s worst
instincts, by supporting and signing into law more financial deregulation
legislation than any other president, according to the Columbia Journalism
Review.
He didn’t just push the Democrats controlling the House to
pass a bill (Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act) that dissolved the Depression-era
Glass-Steagall law, which barred investment banks from commercial banking
activities. He deregulated the risky derivatives market (Commodity Futures
Modernization Act), gutted state regulation of banks (Riegle-Neal) leading to a
wave of banking mergers, and reappointed Alan Greenspan as Federal Reserve chair.
In recent years, Clinton has ludicrously claimed that the GOP forced him to do
this, which led in no small part to the global financial crisis of 2008 and the
too-big-to-fail ethos, with the federal government obligated to bail out
multinational banks while doing little for individual account holders.
“What happened?” he told CNN in 2013. “The American people
gave the Congress to a group of very conservative Republicans. When they passed
bills with veto-proof majority with a lot of Democrats voting for it, that I
couldn’t stop, all of a sudden we turn out to be maniacal deregulators. I mean,
come on.” As CJR put it, “This is, to be kind, bullshit,” reciting a list of
Clinton deregulatory actions that began while Democrats were the majority,
starting with appointing “Robert Rubin and Larry Summers in the Treasury, which
officially did in Glass-Steagall and the Commodity Futures Modernization Act,
which left the derivatives market a laissez-faire Wild West.”
CJR concludes, “The bottom line is: Bill Clinton was
responsible for more damaging financial deregulation—and thus, for the [2008]
financial crisis—than any other president.”
4. Gutted
manufacturing via trade agreements. Bill Clinton helped gut America’s
manufacturing base by promoting and passing the North American Free Trade
Agreement, or NAFTA, in 1993, when Democrats controlled Congress. That
especially resonates today, when another Democratic president, Barack Obama,
and Republicans in Congress, are allied against labor unions and liberal Democrats
to pass its like-minded descendant, the Trans Pacific Partnership. “NAFTA
signaled that the Democratic Party—the “progressive” side of the U.S. two-party
system—had accepted the reactionary economic ideology of Ronald Reagan,” wrote
Jeff Faux, on the Economic Policy Institute Working Economics Blog.
In 1979, then-candidate Reagan proposed a trade pact between
the U.S., Canada and Mexico. But the Democrats who controlled the Congress
would not approve it until Clinton pushed it in his first year in office. NAFTA
has affected U.S. workers in four major ways, EPI said. It caused the permanent
loss of 700,000 manufacturing jobs in industrial states such as California,
Texas and Michigan. It gave corporate managers an excuse to cut wages and
benefits, threatening otherwise to move to Mexico. Selling U.S. farm products
in Mexico “dislocated millions of Mexican workers and their families,” which
“was a major cause in the dramatic increase in undocumented workers flowing
into the U.S. labor market.” And NAFTA became a “template for rules of the
emerging global economy, in which the benefits would flow to capital and the
costs to labor.”
The World Trade Organization, World Bank, International
Monetary Fund all applied NAFTA's principles, which gave corporations the power
to challenge local laws protecting health and safety if they cut into
profits—like labeling tobacco packaging. The NAFTA “doctrine of socialism for
capital and free markets for labor” could also be seen in the way the U.S.
government “organized the rescue of the world’s banks and corporate investors
and let workers fend for themselves” in the Mexican peso crisis of 1994-'95,
the Asian financial crash of 1997, and the global financial meltdown of
2008.
5. No LGBT
equality: Defense of Marriage Act. The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was one
of conservatives' biggest victories in the 1990s. Passed by Congress and signed
into law by Clinton in 1996, the bill defined spouse as
"heterosexual" and deprived legally wed same-sex couples of many
significant benefits, from Social Security benefits to hospital visitation
rights. It allowed states to refuse legal recognition of couples married in
other states.
Writing in the New Yorker, Clinton's former advisor on gay
issues, Richard Socarides, addressed why he signed the wildly discriminatory
legislation. For one thing, Socarides said that Clinton's political opponents
outmaneuvered him. He also chalks up the president's decision as "a
failure to imagine how quickly gay rights would evolve." The former
president was hardly an ardent supporter of the legislation. The New York Times
noted, "Mr. Clinton considered it a gay-baiting measure, but was unwilling
to risk re-election by vetoing it."
But the damage was done. For almost a decade, same-sex
couples suffered financial and emotional hardships. Gay couples weren't allowed
to make medical decisions for their partners, couldn't get the major tax breaks
afforded to heterosexual couples, and faced unequal treatment in many other
areas of law. In 2013, Clinton stated his opposition to the law. That year, in
a major gay rights victory, the Supreme Court declared DOMA’s Section 3 (which
defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman) unconstitutional. Today,
37 states have legalized same-sex marriage, and in coming days, the Supreme
Court is expected to do so.
6. Expanded the
war on drugs. Although Clinton called for treatment instead of prison for drug
offenders during his 1992 campaign, once in office he reverted to the same drug
war strategies of his Republican predecessors. He rejected the U.S. Sentencing
Commission's recommendation to eliminate the disparity between crack and powder
cocaine sentences. He rejected lifting the federal ban on funding for needle
exchange programs. He placed a permanent eligibility ban on food stamps for
anyone convicted of a felony drug offense, even marijuana possession. And he
prohibited felons from living in public housing.
He also championed the 1994 crime bill, a $30 effort that
included more mandatory minimum sentences for crack cocaine, extra funds for
states that severely punished convicts, limited judges' discretion in
sentencing, and allocated billions for federal prison construction and
expansion. During Clinton's tenure, federal prison spending jumped $19 billion
(171%), while funding for public housing declined by $17 billion (61%). Under
Clinton, nearly $1 billion in state spending shifted from education to prisons.
The U.S. prison population doubled from about 600,000 to
about 1.2 million during the Clinton years, and the federal prison population
swelled even more dramatically, driven almost entirely by drug war
prosecutions. Yet a month before leaving office, Clinton said in a Rolling
Stone interview that "we really need a re-examination of our entire policy
on imprisonment" of drug users and that pot smoking "should be
decriminalized." If only he had acted on those sentiments when it mattered.
7. Expanded the
death penalty. When running for president in 1992, then-Arkansas Gov. Clinton
allowed his state to execute Ricky Ray Rector, a convicted murderer with severe
mental impairments. Despite much criticism, Clinton's decision not to commute
the sentence not only established his tough-on-crime credentials as a national
candidate, it also became a precedent to the expansion of the federal death
penalty under his White House.
Clinton’s 1994 crime bill expanded the death penalty to 60
additional crimes including three that don’t involve murder: espionage, treason
and drug trafficking in large amounts. Throughout his presidency he ignored
calls for a national moratorium on federal executions. In April 1996, Clinton
followed up and signed the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act
(AEDPA) into law. Introduced by Kansas Republican Sen. Bob Dole in response to
the Oklahoma City bombings in 1995, it severely restricted the ability of
federal judges to grant relief in cases, reduced trials for convicted criminals
and sped up the sentencing process.
In 2011, Troy Davis, an African American convicted of
killing an off-duty cop, was put to death in Georgia. Davis’ case sparked
nationwide protests as many believed he was innocent. There was no evidence
linking him to the crime and seven witnesses who helped put him on Death Row
later recanted their testimony.
Many believe Bill Clinton helped seal Davis’ fate years
before. Many of Davis’ appeals were denied for procedural reasons and his 2004 petition,
which included the recanted testimony and the possible identity of the killer,
was rejected by the federal judge since, under current regulations, such
evidence has to be presented first in state court. Davis’ defense was unable to
do that because, shortly before AEDPA became law, Congress slashed $20 million
from post-conviction legal defense organizations. In a piece in Time, Brendan
Lowe quoted Dale Baich, an assistant federal public defender in Arizona: “The
bottom line is that the AEDPA is very harsh and unforgiving.”
8. Returned to
Cold War priorities. As the Soviet Union collapsed, the U.S. under President
George H.W. Bush forged ahead with the same imperialist stance toward Europe.
As Bush's successor, Clinton had an historic opportunity to attempt a
cooperative, non-aggressive international model based on international law.
While his administration frequently gave lip service to these ideals, a
far-reaching economic and political agenda to bring Eastern Europe into the
NATO-E.U.-U.S. orbit was in the works. As Clinton's former national security
advisor Anthony Lake summarized, "Throughout the cold war, we contained a
global threat to market democracies: now we should seek to enlarge their
reach." And enlarge they did.
The Clinton administration intervened massively across the
former Soviet satellite states of Eastern Europe, with direct interventions in
the Balkans through NATO, corporate buyouts of industry from Poland to the
Czech Republic, and the notorious "shock doctrine" of neoliberal
economic reforms in exchange for IMF loans: cutting wages and corporate taxes,
increasing working hours and slashing social programs. Bringing the Baltic
states and Eastern Bloc countries into military arrangements associated with
NATO, and establishing a major military garrison in the Balkans, Bill Clinton
set the stage for the clash on Russia's border in Ukraine currently overseen by
Obama, which could last for decades and undermine the process of integrating
Russia into the industrialized world.
9. Joycelyn
Elders and the culture war. At a 1994 U.N. Conference on AIDS, the U.S. Surgeon
General, Joycelyn Elders, was asked if “a more explicit discussion and
promotion of masturbation” could help limit the spread of the virus. Elders
said she was “a very strong advocate” of teaching sex education in schools “at
a very early age.” She added, “As per your specific question in regard to
masturbation, I think that it is something that is a part of human sexuality
and it’s a part of something that perhaps should be taught. But we’ve not even
taught our children the very basics.”
Less than a month later, Elders was asked for her
resignation. She had spent just 15 month serving as Surgeon General of the
Public Health Service under the Clinton administration. As Arkansas governor,
Clinton had appointed her director of the state’s Health Department, the first
African American to hold the title.
Elders later clarified that she'd suggested not to teach
schoolchildren how to masturbate, but that masturbation is a natural part of
human sexuality. “People have taken a lot of things I’ve said in a most unusual
way,” she said. However, Clinton White House chief of staff Leon E. Panetta
said her comment was, “just one too many,” and her remarks on masturbation were
“not what a surgeon general should say.” Elders has also endorsed legalizing drugs
and giving out birth control in high schools.
Then-House Speaker Newt Gingrich said, "It's good for
the country and good for the president that she's departed." But as the
New York Times reported, Elders' dismissal was met with heavy criticism from gay
rights organizations, abortion rights groups and liberal organizations like
People for the American Way. The New York City chapter of Planned Parenthood
commented, "Mr. Clinton will be making a serious political mistake if he
continues to try to out-Newt Mr. Gingrich.”
10. Turning
Lincoln Bedroom into fundraising condo. The Lincoln Bedroom is an historic
bedroom on the second floor of the White House that was at one time Abraham
Lincoln's personal office. Under Clinton, it served another purpose: an overnight
apartment for top political donors. Between 1995 and 1996, donors who gave a
total of $5.4 million to the Democratic National Committee—including
businessman William Rollnick, who gave $235,000 to the DNC, and investor Dirk
Ziff, who gave $411,000—stayed overnight as White House guests.
Clinton had few doubts about the idea. When originally
pitched to him in a note by deputy chief of staff Harold Ickes, the president
responded, “Ready to start overnights right away.” Sadly, Clinton started a
trend. On the campaign trail, George W. Bush criticized Clinton for “virtually
renting out the Lincoln Bedroom to big campaign donors.” Yet when Bush took
office he continued the practice, handing the location over to donors who had
given him over $100,000 and personal friends, including Texas oilman Joe
O'Neill and Republican National Committee fundraiser Brad Freeman.
11. Bombed
Sudanese pharmaceutical plant. On Aug. 20, 1998 the Al-Shifa pharmaceutical
factory in Khartoum North, Sudan was annihilated by a cruise missile strike
launched by the Clinton administration. President Clinton claimed the plant was
making a deadly nerve agent and maintained connections to Osama bin Laden, who
was unknown to most Americans at the time. Sudan claimed it was a factory producing
medicines that saved thousands.
The factory’s owner, Salah Idris, denied the allegations
vehemently and unsuccessfully tried to sue the U.S. government. According to a
U.K. Guardian story, the plant "provided 50 percent of Sudan’s medicines”
and was the country’s main source of anti-malaria drugs. Germany’s ambassador
to Sudan, Werner Daum, says the bombing led to "several tens of thousands
of deaths” and Human Rights Watch wrote a letter to the president explaining
how it had slowed down relief efforts in the region. In his book, Al-Qaeda:
Casting a Shadow of Terror, Jason Burke credits the bombing with bolstering
terrorism: “[it] confirmed to [bin Laden and his cohorts], and others with
similar views worldwide, that their conception of the world as a cosmic
struggle between good and evil was the right one.” Noam Chomsky has written
that the bombing’s consequences “may be comparable” to the attacks of September
11.
12. Doubled down
on Iraq sanctions. Due to President George W. Bush’s disastrous war of choice
in Iraq, people forget Bill Clinton’s Iraq humanitarian disaster: U.S.
sanctions that decimated the Iraqi economy, crippled the civilian
infrastructure, and according to a 1999 UNICEF survey, ultimately led to the
deaths of more than 500,000 children. Though the sanctions began under
President George H.W. Bush in 1990, Clinton expanded them, insisting a week
before he took office in 1993, “There is no difference between my policy and
the policy of the [Bush] administration” and squashing any subsequent effort to
rein them in.
In 1996, Clinton’s Secretary of State Madeleine Albright
continued to defend the sanctions. By 2000, some members of Congress cited an
increasing number of reports of the humanitarian crisis, calling for an end to
sanctions. House Democratic Whip David Bonior referred to it as “infanticide
masquerading as policy.” But Clinton refused to budge, defending the policy
until the end of his presidency in 2001. Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden cited
the sanctions as one of his primary motives behind the 9/11 attacks on New York
City and Washington, DC later that year.
13. Political
smears: Sistah Souljah. Clinton was highly regarded by African Americans during
the 1992 election cycle for his ability to articulate how racism impacted their
communities. However, when it mattered most, he dropped the ball on race when
it was completely unnecessary. It started when he blasted hop-hop artist Sistah
Souljah over her comments in a Washington Post article about the Los Angeles
riots, which were sparked by the acquittal of several Los Angeles policemen who
beat truck driver Rodney King. “If black people kill black people every day,
why not have a week and kill white people?” she said.
Souljah claims she was misquoted. However, a few weeks later,
both she and Clinton spoke at Jesse Jackson’s Rainbow Coalition conference in
Washington. Clinton used his appearance to criticize her statements, saying,
“We can’t get anywhere in this country pointing the finger at one another
across racial lines.” He compared her remarks to former KKK wizard David
Duke.
As Matt Bai wrote for Yahoo, Clinton was not going to lose
black votes by calling the rapper out. Black people were (and still are) hyper
loyal to the Democratic Party. But since Clinton is being reflective about his
presidency, perhaps he needs to go back to 1992 and rethink why he used his
time at the Rainbow Coalition to appeal to a segment of white voters who may
have wanted to see him distance himself from Rev. Jackson, still a key leader
in the Democratic Party at the time.
If you read the full Washington Post coverage and listen to
some of Sistah Souljah's commentary on white supremacy, you’ll see she makes
some valuable points about anti-blackness and structural racism that are worth
considering. But Clinton chose not to delve into that. Instead, he preferred to
sell a sistah out and play the saxophone on the Arsenio Hall show.
14. Knew about
coming Rwandan genocide. This might be Clinton’s worst foreign policy failure.
Intelligence analysts knew in advance about the plans for the Hutu-led genocide
against Tutsis in Rwanda, yet the White House did nothing to try to stop it. In
2013, Clinton told MSNBS that he could have sent some 10,000 U.S. troops to the
Central African nation to support a U.N. peacekeeping force and perhaps saved
300,000 lives—about a third of those who perished.
In retrospect, Clinton said, “You can’t stop everything bad
that's happening.” He pointed to his success ending sectarian violence in
Northern Ireland, the Bosnian war and the 1993 Oslo Accord between Israel and
the Palestinians. The fact remains that the White House knew one of the worst
genocides since World War II was coming, and did not try to halt it.
15. Escalated
America's foreign drug wars. In Clinton's second term, he initiated Plan
Colombia, a multibillion-dollar effort to reduce that country's coca and
cocaine production and end a decades-long war between Bogota and leftist FARC
rebels. While Colombian President Andres Pastrana Arango originally envisioned
the initiative as an economic development, roughly 80% of U.S. aid under Plan
Colombia was military assistance, making Colombia the third largest recipient
of foreign aid after Israel and Egypt.
Plan Colombia strengthened the Colombian military, which was
allied with rightist paramilitary groups. It made gains against the drug trade
and the FARC, but at a huge cost. Tens of thousands of civilians were killed
and hundreds of thousands became internal refugees. Concern over human rights
abuses in the Colombian security forces resulted in the passage of the Leahy
Provision, which barred anti-drug aid to any military unit involved in human
rights abuses.
And then there was Mexico. Early this year when in Mexico,
Clinton apologized for the U.S. role in the war on drugs and also for NAFTA,
both of which led to violence. “I wish you had no narco-trafficking, but it’s
not really your fault,” he said. Clinton’s policies were a double blow for
Mexico. He deepened the drug war’s efforts to reduce U.S. domestic drug use by
interdicting flows from abroad, forever changing the nature of Mexico's
contraband economy from small-time mom-and-pop operations to the immensely
wealthy, powerful and violent cartels of today. Meanwhile, NAFTA opened the
floodgates to illegal drugs hidden in the massive flows of legitimate commerce
across the border. Large corporations weren't the only beneficiaries of free
trade; so were Mexican drug traffickers.
Join the socialists in a refusal to vote for evil, either of
the lesser or the greater sort. This is the only way we can avoid a repeat
performance with Hillary.
No comments:
Post a Comment